That's what Virginia wants.
Virginia’s attorney general announced on Thursday that he hoped to bypass an initial appellate review by asking the United States Supreme Court to consider the constitutionality of the Obama health care law on an expedited basis.
Only rarely does the Supreme Court grant such hearings, and it has already rejected a similar request in another legal challenge to the health care act. But the commonwealth’s attorney general, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II, said the legal and governmental confusion sown by conflicting lower-court opinions demanded a rapid resolution. ...NYT
This is the first example of "judicial activism" I've seen that is truly in that category. Most accusations of judicial activism are vaguer, more tempered by time. That the right is insisting on a quick and satisfactory (to them) resolution is the real mcCoy -- judicial activism as a tool of childish urgency and frustration. We want what we want and we want it now!
