Fed's dirty underwear

... During the years of the housing boom, the pleas failed to move the Fed, the sole federal regulator with authority over the businesses. Under a policy quietly formalized in 1998, the Fed refused to police lenders' compliance with federal laws protecting borrowers, despite repeated urging by consumer advocates across the country and even by other government agencies.

The hands-off policy, which the Fed reversed earlier this month, created a double standard. Banks and their subprime affiliates made loans under the same laws, but only the banks faced regular federal scrutiny. Under the policy, the Fed did not even investigate consumer complaints against the affiliates.

Wait!  Knowing this, are we happy about leaving much of what passes for "regulation" with the Fed? 

Look at 1999.

Three times a year, a coalition of Chicago community groups met with the Federal Reserve and other banking regulators to warn about the growing prevalence of abusive mortgage lending.

They began to present research in 1999 showing that large banking companies including Wells Fargo and Citigroup had created subprime businesses wholly focused on making loans at high interest rates, largely in the black and Hispanic neighborhoods to the south and west of downtown Chicago.

The groups pleaded for regulators to act.

And the regulators finally acted.  Ten years later. In July 2009. Long after the damage had begun to pile up.

Binyamin Applebaum's "first in a series of articles about the record of the Federal Reserve" in today's Post amounts to an indictment.  

Meanwhile, everything is coming up roses.  You'll see.

"In looking at our responsibility to enforce these consumer laws we believe a somewhat more proactive stance is justified," Bernanke told Congress.

The Fed also said it will begin to investigate consumer complaints.