« Gun control is so-o-o over! | Main | The risk for Obama has increased »


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference We're closer to full employment than we thought:



Stop measuring or at least emphasizing UE and instead put 90% of all focus on the number employed in full time jobs. I think we are still below the 07 peak there. 5 years on mind you and every year adds the need for 1 million more jobs needed because of population growth.

UE is a pile of dung, forgetaboutit. You know and 3% of the population know the UE number is determined as much by people leaving or entering the job market as it is by people actually having full time jobs.

Of course emphasizing full time jobs is destined to be a depressing exercise. Emphasizing UE is easy and more profitable for economists and commentators because it plays into the hands or our elites.


You have raised some interesting issues, Rapier, but I'd like to point out that statistics coming from institutions will generally reflect the interests of the institution rather than those of the consumer of the stats.

As it happens in my area, my land phone server is Verizon and they have a monopoly. Their rates and the bills are a scandal. Hidden in taxes and fees are some of Verizon's additional profits. Does this serve Verizon's customers in any way? Nope. But it works very well for Verizon.

Same with gov stats. They are only useful as a way of rooting out variations over time and/or (sometimes) figuring out just what any given bureaucracy or administration or system needs to exist. Our "elites" are simply people and institutions that have figured out the most effective way to to use various forms of communication and media to muffle their relative uselessness.

As for unemployment, let's start with 5% being "acceptable."

The comments to this entry are closed.

My Photo

The Scribe

Under the hood

  • BlogBurst.com
Blog powered by Typepad