Jonathan Chait points to what could be a satisfactory conclusion to all this argy-bargy about who should be president. Like obviously: Romney. Rightwing writer Conn Carroll's point is incontrovertible.
... Yesterday Stephanie Cutter said well, maybe he is a felon.
That's a pretty wild charge to be throwing out without evidence. Conn Carroll of the conservative Washington Examiner has what he considers a knock-out response — if Romney is a felon, why hasn't Obama prosecuted him?
... if it is a felony, then why isn’t the nation’s top law enforcement officer, Obama, prosecuting Romney?
Either Obama’s Bain attacks are all lies or he has granted amnesty to a Wall Street felon.
I see a powerful opening for Romney. Obama is so soft on white-collar crime, he granted amnesty to white-collar criminal Mitt Romney. Vote Romney for president. ...Jonathan Chait
Seems perfectly logical. Isn't it?