James Galbraith has seen it coming and says he's beginning to feel "vindicated."
I'm just scared, are you?
Galbraith warned from the get-go that Bush's stimulus package wouldn't work, that Obama's was insufficient*, and it looks as though he's right. He has also been a fierce critic of "toxic assets." He was on the right track there, too. From McClatchy:
The program's still not operating.
"We're committed to getting it done, and expect to have it very, very soon," said Andrew Williams, a Treasury spokesman. "It's complicated and takes time."
Until the banking sector fully recovers, experts warn, the economy will face a long slog back.
"I don't see that we've put in place the foundations for a durable recovery. The freefall is over, and that allows some of the positives to show . . . but that doesn't mean that 2010 is a lock for expansion," said Vince Reinhart, a former top economist at the Federal Reserve.
McClatchy describes the economy as "stuck in quicksand."
How the Republicans are taking the prospect of deeper recession -- okay, let's say it, depression -- is summed up in a paragraph in WaPo.
As noted earlier, Harper's has a very illuminating article on the parallels between the Hoover and Obama administrations -- and the parallels extend to Congress in the early '30's.
More on what Galbraith -- and other economists and political analysts -- are saying about the economy in July 2009 here.
____
*This is the fault of the overly conservative members of the White House economic team and a pusillanimous Congress. That word has to be the source for "pussy" in the sense of scaredy-cat. Among other things, Republican members of Congress, for all their caterwauling, really are pussies.

Obama's conservatism has been underreported.
Obama offered a conservative recovery plan and the right wing extremists controlling the Republican Party watered it down with the help of the Blue-Dogs (AKA: Moderate Republicans masquerading as Dems).
Posted by: News Reference | July 08, 2009 at 04:25 PM
His conservatism has been getting a lot of comment on this blog, though, going back to his campaign when much of the discussion was about the cross-overs from the Republican party who were supporting him.
Posted by: PW | July 08, 2009 at 04:56 PM