The emergence of the issue of the superdelegates' votes made many of us feel as though we and democracy were taking a punch in the gut. Now it turns out that the Clinton campaign is planning a raid -- apparently within Democratic party rules -- on delegates already pledged to Obama. Roger Simon writes in Politico:
Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign intends to go after delegates whom Barack Obama has already won in the caucuses and primaries if she needs them to win the nomination.
This strategy was confirmed to me by a high-ranking Clinton official on Monday. And I am not talking about superdelegates, those 795 party big shots who are not pledged to anybody. I am talking about getting pledged delegates to switch sides.
What? Isn’t that impossible? A pledged delegate is pledged to a particular candidate and cannot switch, right?
Wrong.
Pledged delegates are not really pledged at all, not even on the first ballot. This has been an open secret in the party for years, but it has never really mattered because there has almost always been a clear victor by the time the convention convened.
But not this time. This time, one candidate may enter the convention leading by just a few pledged delegates, and those delegates may find themselves being promised the sun, moon and stars to switch sides. ...
The anger is building.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has warned against it. “I think there is a concern when the public speaks and there is a counter-decision made to that,” she said. “It would be a problem for the party if the verdict would be something different than the public has decided.”
Donna Brazile, who was Al Gore’s campaign manager in 2000 and is a member of the DNC, said recently: “If 795 of my colleagues decide this election, I will quit [the DNC]. I feel very strongly about this.”
On Sunday, Doug Wilder, the mayor of Richmond and a former governor of Virginia, went even further, predicting riots in the streets if the Clinton campaign were to overturn an Obama lead through the use of superdelegates.
“There will be chaos at the convention,” Wilder told Bob Schieffer on “Face the Nation.”
“If you think 1968 was bad, you watch: In 2008, it will be worse.”
It makes one ask what in hell is going on inside the Clinton campaign that they would risk all not only by blandly accepting the use of such a tactic but by talking about it now.
How many times have we told our children to "play fair?" The young people of our nation are receiving a first hand lesson from the pros. Politics 101 - How to play dirty and not can caught.
The Democrats are again being outsmarted by the Republicans. Mrs. Clinon should have been the leader in a fair, decent, race. How it seems the party will self destruct.
Posted by: dana wilson | March 15, 2008 at 06:22 PM